INTERNATIONAL REPORTERS China signals that October 7 was an exercise in international law. The Chinese representative points out to the ICJ that armed resistance against the occupation is enshrined in …More
INTERNATIONAL REPORTERS
China signals that October 7 was an exercise in international law.
The Chinese representative points out to the ICJ that armed resistance against the occupation is enshrined in international law and is not terrorism.
China signals that October 7 was an exercise in international law.
The Chinese representative points out to the ICJ that armed resistance against the occupation is enshrined in international law and is not terrorism.
giveusthisday
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Yes, in international law it is lawful for an occupied territory to fight against the tyranny of the illegal occupiers; in any case do we not all realize the October 7 incident must have been planned - with Israel being at least completely aware, and probably complicit.
